Log In
Sign Up
Signup
Login
Explore
News
Feedback
Explore
News
Not soup
Follow
16517
posts
155
followers
35
following
Reposted from
muaddib
via
larrygreensky
muaddib
larrygreensky
Whew... So the fourier transform here has a little of misleading symbolics. Normally the exponent would read -i*2*pi*f*x OR -i*omega*x with omega being 2*pi*f
Writing -i*2*pi*omega*x assumes omega to be the frequency rather than the angular frequency, yet in literature you will find omega to almost *always* be the angular frequency
Sorry to be the killjoy here, but I had to clarify as someone who uses the transform quite *drumroll* frequently
I have to admit I didn't look too careful before rebloging. And also - it's been a few years since I had to use the fourier transform, so I wouldn't have catched it anyway :D
Thanks for the great explanation!
I'm always happy to be corrected and learn something.
Ah it was just my smartassness kicking me saying: "yes, buuuut..." :D
It's not a problem actually (so the formula is correct as is) but notation is kind of misleading (at least for electrical engineers) :p